CPT Absent from Diplomatic Receptions: A Sign of Growing Isolation?
Diplomatic receptions are never mere celebrations. They are carefully choreographed political stages, snapshots that reveal the state of international relations.
The recent US and Canadian national celebrations in Haiti offered a telling spectacle—precisely because of who was absent: the members of the Transitional Presidential Council (CPT).
The observation is striking. While the US Embassy described an “intimate” reception with “Haitian friends and partners,” and Canada maintained a discreet silence, there is no public evidence of the presence of the transitional leadership.
Only Fritz Jean, the CPT’s coordinator, made sporadic appearances. Was this a protocol oversight? Or a deliberate exclusion?
The silence of the images is deafening. In the nuanced language of diplomacy, it underscores the CPT’s extreme fragility on the international stage.
Being absent from these key events, where alliances are forged and political balances assessed, is a stinging rebuke.
This absence is not a trivial protocol misstep: it reflects growing distrust and an erosion of diplomatic credibility.
The legitimacy and effectiveness of the transitional leadership are now openly questioned by critical international partners.
A pressing question arises: does this exclusion signal the start of the CPT’s definitive marginalization on the diplomatic stage where Haiti’s future is being shaped?
Discussion about this post